I harbour no enmity-my last statement (1)
Liu Xiaobo (23 December 2009)
http://news.mingpao.com/20100210/emc1.htm
My trajectory of life, which began more than half a century ago, took a major turn in June, 1989.
I took the first post-Cultural Revolution matriculation exam, got admitted to university and graduated in 1977. I subsequently earned my master's and doctorate.
My studies were plain sailing. After I had finished my studies, I taught at Beijing Normal University, my alma mater.
I was popular with my students on my rostrum. I was also a public intellectual.
In the 1980s, I published some works that made a stir. I was often invited to make speeches in other places. I was often invited to American and European universities as a visiting scholar.
I demanded that I live an honest, responsible and dignified person and writer. I returned from the US to take part in the 1989 movement.
Subsequently, I was put behind bars for "counter-revolutionary propaganda and incitement"; I lost my rostrum, which I deeply loved; and I was prohibited from making any speeches or publishing any articles on the mainland.
Just because I had expressed dissent and taken part in the peaceful pro-democracy movement, I, a teacher, lost my rostrum, a writer, lost my right to publish, a public intellectual, was prohibited from speaking to the public.
That is sad to me and to China, whose gaige kaifang (reform and opening-up) began three decades ago.
"That is sad to me and to China"
In retrospect, the most dramatic experiences I have had since June 4 have to do with the court. I have had two opportunities to speak openly.
I spoke openly here, in the Beijing Municipal Intermediate Court, in January 1991, as I do now. I was then charged with different crimes.
However, all the charges that have been laid against me are essentially the same-of expressing my views.
Twenty years has passed, but the innocents killed in June 4 would not rest in their graves.
Since I came out of Qincheng Prison in 1991, I, whom my obsession with June 4 has led to the road of dissent, have been barred from exercising my right to speak to the public in my motherland.
I can only express my views in non-mainland publications. Because I have done so, I have long been watched.
I lived at home under surveillance (May 1995-January 1996) and was re-educated through labour(October 1996-October 1999).
Now the regime's enmity has put me in the dock. However, I want to tell the regime, which has deprived me of my liberty, that I adhere to the belief I expressed in my June 2 hunger strike declaration two decades ago-that I regard none as my enemy and I bear no hatred.
There are police officers who have arrested me, procurators who have prosecuted me and judges who have convicted me. I regard none of them as my enemy.
There is no way I can accept that they have done right to watch me, arrest me or sentence me, but I respect their professions and their integrity.
Procurators Zhang Rongge and Pan Xueqing now represent the prosecution at this trial.
I regard neither of them as my enemy.When you questioned me on December 3, I sensed your respect and sincerity.
Hopes to dissolve hatred with love
Here is my reason. H
atred eats into wisdom and conscience, and enmity poisons a people's spirit, provokes cruel life-and-death struggles, destroys a society's tolerance and humanity, and hinders a nation's progress towards freedom and democracy.
I therefore hope I can look beyond what has befallen me at my country's progress and social changes, respond to the regime's enmity with the uttermost goodwill, and dissolve hatred with love.
As everybody knows, it is gaige kaifang that has brought about progress and social changes in our country.
In my view, gaige kaifang began when the government dumped the policy of "regarding class struggle as the key link" (which it adopted in the Mao era) and began to devote its effort to developing the economy and fostering social harmony.
The process of discarding the struggle philosophy is one of lessening enmity, dissolving hatred and purging humanity of "wolf's milk".
It is this process that has brought about loose conditions at home and abroad for pursuing gaige kaifang and soft and humane soil that allows interpersonal love to be restored and various interests and values to co-exist in peace.
That is humane incentive for our people to regain love and bring their creativity into play.
One may say that, if the government had not ceased "fighting imperialism and revisionism" abroad or "pursuing class struggle" at home, China's gaige kaifang would not have persisted.
China owes to the lessening of enmity its market economy, cultural diversity and law and order.
Even in the realm of politics, where progress has been slowest, the lessening of enmity has enabled the regime to become more and more tolerant of social diversity, persecute dissidents much less vigorously, and say the 1989 movement was in nature not "turmoil", but "a political disturbance".
The lessening of enmity has enabled the regime to accept the universality of human rights.
In 1998, the Chinese government made a pledge to the world by signing two major United Nations human rights international covenants.
That marks China's acceptance of the universally-accepted human rights standards. In 2004, the National People's Congress adopted an amendment to the constitution that provides that "the state respects and protects human rights".
That shows it is now one of the cardinal principles of Chinese justice to protect human rights. Furthermore, the incumbent administration has said it puts the people first and strives to bring about social harmony.
That shows the Communist Party of China now subscribes to ideas of government that are more progressive.
I have felt such macroscopic progress in what I have experienced since I was recently arrested.
[
本帖最後由 小奈由季 於 2010-2-10 14:46 編輯 ]